Layout Image
Join Northern Plains Resource Council Support Northern Plains Resource Council with a donation
  • News
  • About Us
    • How We Work
    • Events
    • What We Believe
    • History
      • 1970′s Coal
      • Family Agriculture
      • Tongue River Railroad
      • Hard Rock Mining
      • Property Rights
      • Coal Bed Methane
      • Going Green
      • The New Coal Rush
    • Our staff
    • Board of Directors
    • Contact us
    • Publications
    • Careers
  • The Issues
    • Agriculture
    • Clean Energy
    • Coal
    • Coal Bed Methane
    • Good Neighbor Agreement
    • Hydraulic fracturing and deep shale gas
    • Landowner Rights
    • Tar Sands Pipeline
    • Tongue River Railroad
  • Fact Sheets
    • See all fact sheets
    • Quick link >>
      • Your Water Your Rights
      • Old vs. New Energy
      • Clean Energy Jobs
      • Eminent Domain
      • Coal export factsheet
      • Coal Ash facts
      • Renewable Energy Standard
      • CBM: Doing it Right
      • Energy Efficiency in Schools
      • Farm to School Program
      • Hydraulic Fracturing
      • Hydro Projects Fact Sheet
      • No Mandatory Animal ID
      • Your Gas and Oil Land Rights
      • Otter Creek Coal Tract Facts
      • Tar Sands Pipeline
      • Pipeline Landowners Position
      • Pipeline Landowner Rights
      • Rural Electric Cooperation
      • Sustainable Biodiesel
  • Our Local Groups
    • Bear Creek Council
    • Bull Mountain Land Alliance
    • Carbon County Resource Council
    • Cottonwood Resource Council
    • Dawson Resource Council
    • Rosebud Protective Association
    • Stillwater Protective Association
    • Yellowstone Valley Citizens Council
  • Our Building
    • Overview
    • Home on the Range Gardens
    • Meeting room reservations
    • Meeting room request form
    • Photo gallery
    • Blessing of Building
  • Take Action
    • Support our work
    • Volunteer
    • Contact Public Officials
    • Write a letter
    • Making a Difference
  • Legislature
    • 2011 Legislative Scorecard.pdf
    • Legislative bills important to Northern Plains
    • For the Love of Montana Rally

Archive for CBM

Free movie ‘Gasland’ May 17 at Yogo Inn in Lewistown

By Larry Winslow · Comments (0)
Tuesday, May 1st, 2012

Gasland
5:30 p.m., May 17
Yogo Inn
Lewistown
Free

A free screening of the compelling, award-winning documentary Gasland will be held at 5:30 p.m. Thursday, May 17, at the Yogo Inn in Lewistown. In the film, family ranchers and farmers in oil and gas fields talk about the real effects of hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” on their land and lives.

At the event, you’ll meet John Fenton, Wyoming farmer/rancher, who appears in Gasland. Fenton will introduce the film, relate personal experiences after oil and gas fracking occurred beneath his land, and answer your questions.

Learn “the rest of the story” at this informative evening. Coffee, lemonade and cookies will be provided.  Admission is free and all are welcome. The event is co-sponsored by Northern Plains Resource Council and Madison Aquifer Alliance. Don’t miss it!

Northern Plains, based in Billings, organizes Montana citizens to protect our water quality, family farms and ranches, and unique quality of life. The mission of Madison Aquifer Alliance, based in Lewistown, is to raise community awareness about issues surrounding water, including the consequences of fracking and oil/gas development, to foster more sustainable economic alternatives, and to ensure the continued purity of the Madison Aquifer, the Big Snowy Mountains, and the plains and people that surround them.

Contact Laurie Lohrer, 406-538-5187, laurielohrer@hotmail.com
or
Olivia Stockman, Northern Plains Resource Council, 406-248-1154, olivia@northernplains.org

 

Comments (0)
Categories : Agriculture, CBM, Clean Water, Events, Landowner Rights, News, Northern Plains Resource Council

Montana ranchers back poll findings that favor clean energy over old, dirty energy – April 25, 2012

By Larry Winslow · Comments (0)
Wednesday, April 25th, 2012

Civil Society Institute website

View the report

 Water quality all-important in Montana

By Northern Plains Resource Council

BILLINGS, Mont. — For farmers and ranchers in Montana and the rest of the United States, clean water is the lifeblood of their livelihood.

In a March 2012 nationwide poll, eight out of 10 Americans agree that “water shortages and the availability of clean drinking water are real concerns. America should put the emphasis on first developing new energy sources that require less water and result in lower water pollution. Only 15 percent of Americans think that “America should proceed first with developing energy sources even if they may have significant water pollution and water shortage downsides.”

ORC International did the study for the Civil Society Institute and Northern Plains Resource Council, which was released during a national teleconference at 11:30 a.m. today.

“We are constantly told we have to sacrifice good water in order to develop more fossil fuels,” said Terry Punt, Birney rancher and member of Northern Plains Resource Council. “The verdict of this new survey is clear: Most Americans understand that sacrificing water is too high a price for dirty energy.”

Also important to Montanans and which the pollsters asked was about hydraulic fracturing, a process used in drilling for hard-to-reach natural gas that uses toxic chemicals and can damage underground water supplies. Nearly six in 10 Americans (56 percent) are now aware of  “fracking.”  Fewer than three in 10 Americans (28 percent) are “not aware at all” of this extraction process. Eight out of 10 Americans (81 percent) who are aware of fracking say that they are concerned – including nearly half (47 percent) who are “very concerned” – about the impact of fracking on water quality.

“Our ranch is leased for grazing and absolutely would not function without clean water. I am concerned about what gas development could do to the water,” said Cindy Webber, Big Timber rancher and member of Cottonwood Resource Council. “We need to protect our ranch from toxic pollution.”

“Educating the public is a priority for our organization – the Cottonwood Resource Council in Sweet Grass County. We realize that citizens cannot make informed choices without more transparency from the fossil fuels industry. Legislation and enforcement that protects our water quality and quantity is essential for all aspects of ours and our children’s lives.”

Pam Solo, founder and president, Civil Society Institute, said: “Our new survey is a clarion call to action:  Americans think that it is time for  decisive action toward a renewable energy future that will protect public health and provide reliable and cost effective energy.   It is only through the work of groups like Northern Plains Resource Council that this ‘bottom up’ process of change will take place.   And it is only through such a grassroots-driven process that we can shake off the partisan gridlock of Washington, D.C., so that Americans can focus on what is really important to them:  a clean energy future that does not sacrifice our water, air and health to politically powerful nuclear and fossil fuel interests.”

According to the poll, Republicans, Independents and Democrats all agree the United States should move away from its reliance on dirty energy sources that foul the air and water and toward a future that makes greater use of clean energy sources.

Besides clean water, the new ORC International survey of 1,019 Americans conducted March 22-25, 2012, shows that:

  • More than eight out of 10 Americans (83 percent) – including 69 percent of Republicans, 84 percent of Independents, and 95 percent of Democrats — agree with the following statement:   ‘The time is now for a new, grassroots-driven politics to realize a renewable energy future.  Congress is debating large public investments in energy and we need to take action to ensure that our taxpayer dollars support renewable energy– one that protects public health, promotes energy independence and the economic well being of all Americans.”
  • Even with high gasoline prices today, 85 percent of Americans – including 76 percent of Republicans,  87 percent of Independents, and   91 percent of Democrats –  agree with the statement “Energy development should be balanced with health and environmental concerns” versus just 13 percent who think “health and environmental concerns should not block energy development.”
  • More than two out of three (68 percent) think it is “a bad idea for the nation to ‘put on hold’ progress towards cleaner energy sources during the current economic difficulty.”
  • Two thirds of Americans (67 percent) think that “political leaders should help to steer the U.S. to greater use of cleaner energy sources – such as increased efficiency, wind and solar – that result in fewer environmental and health damages.”   Under a third of Americans (30 percent) think that “political leaders should stay out of the energy markets and let private enterprise have a free hand in picking energy sources and setting prices.”
Comments (0)
Categories : Agriculture, CBM, Clean Energy, Clean Water, Coal, Fossil Fuels, Member news, News, Northern Plains Resource Council

Court hands setback to SE Montana coal railroad – Associated Press, Dec. 30, 2011

By Larry Winslow · Comments (0)
Wednesday, January 4th, 2012

http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/court-hands-setback-to-se-montana-coal-railroad/article_a82f0258-3326-11e1-86f2-001871e3ce6c.html

MATT VOLZ
Associated Press

HELENA — A federal appeals court has handed a new setback to developers of a proposed $550 million railroad that would link southeastern Montana’s untapped coal reserves to Midwestern and overseas markets.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Thursday that the Surface Transportation Board did not take a hard enough look at the environmental risks when it approved the 130-mile Tongue River Railroad line in 2007, including the effects of developing the vast Otter Creek coal tracts.

The Tongue River Railroad Co. has been trying to build the line since 1986 to open new areas of the Powder River Basin to coal mining. Five plaintiffs led by the Northern Plains Resource Council challenged the decision by the Surface Transportation Board to approve the line, claiming the federal board fell short in several areas of its environmental impact statement.

The three-judge panel agreed with the plaintiffs that the board’s analysis relied on old data and didn’t include enough information to determine what the effects would be on water quality and wildlife in the area, such as the endangered pallid sturgeon and the sage grouse.

The board’s study of the cumulative environmental effects of coal-bed methane development in the area was too limited, the judges also ruled.

But perhaps most significantly, the Surface Transportation Board now must consider the development of the Otter Creek Coal Mine in its study of the cumulative effects.

Arch Coal Inc. has amassed the leasing rights on 1.5 billion tons of coal in the Otter Creek tracts near Ashland, including tracts leased last year from the state and those already leased from Great Northern Properties of Houston.

Arch needs a new rail line to realize its plan to ship the coal to markets in the Midwest and overseas, and its interest in developing the coal tracts had appeared to boost momentum for the Tongue River Railroad.

One of the plaintiffs, rancher and Northern Plains Resource Council board member Mark Fix, said the appellate court’s decision means the Surface Transportation Board must conduct a new environmental impact study. That buys more time in his fight against the railroad after the Arch Coal deal with the state seemed to put the project on a fast track.

“To me, it feels like a big weight has been taken off my chest,” Fix said. “Right now, it feels good. It feels like I got a breath of fresh air.”

The proposed railroad route would cut through Fix’s ranch 20 miles southwest of Miles City. He said he is not just concerned about the railroad’s effect on his ranch’s operations, but the possible damage to the water quality and the environment around him.

Much has changed with Arch Coal’s acquisition, he said. The target market for the coal is now no longer just the Midwest, but has expanded to Asian markets like China. The Surface Transportation Board needs to account for that expansion, he said.

“A lot of things need to be looked at. If people step back and start looking at all the effects, they may realize that this is not the best thing to do right now,” Fix said.

The judicial panel rejected other claims by the plaintiffs, including charges that the board applied the wrong laws in granting permission to build the rail line and that the board improperly limited the geographic scope of its analysis.

Messages left with the Surface Transportation Board and the Tongue River Railroad Co.’s attorneys in Montana and Washington, D.C., were not returned on Friday.

 

Comments (0)
Categories : Agriculture, CBM, Climate change, Coal, Fossil Fuels, Landowner Rights, News, Northern Plains Resource Council

Court sends federal agency back to square one on proposed coal-hauling Montana railroad – December 30, 2011

By Larry Winslow · Comments (0)
Friday, December 30th, 2011

By Northern Plains Resource Council

Opponents of the controversial, proposed Tongue River Railroad (TRR), which would carry coal from the undeveloped Otter Creek coal tracts near Ashland, Montana, won a strong ruling from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday night. The Court ruled that the federal Surface Transportation Board (STB) did a shoddy job analyzing the impacts to the productive, agricultural Tongue River Valley in southeastern Montana.

The Court ruled in a 56-page decision on a long-standing challenge by the Northern Plains Resource Council against the TRR for failing to do a competent analysis of the environmental impacts from the coal hauling railroad. 

“This ruling proves that it is illegal to carelessly blaze ahead with projects that would industrialize an entire valley, and use condemnation on Montana landowners to send coal to Asia, without a careful look at the environmental impacts,” said Mark Fix, former Chair of Northern Plains and a Tongue River rancher who is in the path of the proposed TRR. “The Surface Transportation Board did what we call a windshield study – it’s almost as if they drove around and looked out the car window and based their analysis on that. It’s not fair to landowners like me who could be condemned by this railroad.

“It is our position that the Tongue River Railroad cannot proceed with right-of-way acquisition, eminent domain condemnation or construction of any type until a competent examination of how an enormous new coal mine and a coal-hauling railroad would affect water and air quality, wildlife, and property rights. This must be done and any further legal concerns fully resolved before this railroad even considers moving forward.”

Northern Plains Resource Council understands the ruling to mean that the STB will have to go back to square one and do a new environmental impact statement (EIS) that considers the fact that this coal is now destined for China and Asia instead of the Upper Midwest markets as was the original justification for the railroad. 

The Ninth Circuit ruling also means the STB will have do an EIS on Otter Creek – which is what a different Northern Plains’ lawsuit saysthe state of Montana State Land Board has failed to do.

The ruling means STB:

  • Must now look at the cumulative impacts of Otter Creek coal mining;
  • Cannot rely on stale data. The TRR company and STB used old data, some of which in some cases is more than 30 years old and was done when the coal leasing EIS’s were done;
  • Cannot rely on after-the-fact mitigation and must study up-front the impacts of TRR and Otter Creek on the Mile City Fish Hatchery, sage grouse, pallid sturgeon, and other troubled wildlife species; 
  • Must look at cumulative impacts of coalbed methane development and cannot arbitrarily choose a timeframe to limit its “hard look.” STB had limited its hard look to the first five years of cumulative impacts from the start of construction of the railroad.

Read the 56-page ruling (pdf)>>

Comments (0)
Categories : Agriculture, CBM, Clean Water, Coal, Courts, Fossil Fuels, Landowner Rights, News, Northern Plains Resource Council

Letter: Lobby for disclosure of fracking fluids – Billings Gazette, June 12, 2011

By Larry Winslow · Comments (0)
Monday, June 13th, 2011

http://billingsgazette.com/news/opinion/mailbag/article_d627d792-1514-579a-ab20-3bc705456292.html

Americans have been depending on Montana’s resources for a long time, and Montanans welcome the jobs and prosperity that accompany the extraction of ore, coal, oil and gas. But extractors and their allies in the Legislature mistakenly believe that regulations protecting public health and the environment are not compatible with doing business in our state.

Most recently, they refused to support a bill that required gas companies to disclose the toxic chemicals pumped into the ground during the hydraulic fracturing process.

Gas companies still claim that fracking fluids are “trade secrets” and that water supplies are never contaminated. But if no contamination ever takes place, what harm can there be in disclosing the chemicals?

The issue of fracking disclosure is now up to the Montana Board of Oil and Gas. A draft set of rules and regulations can be found on its website (http://bogc.dnrc.mt.gov/PDF/36-22-157pro-arm.pdf). It appears from the draft that the board has once again bought the industry’s premise that disclosure would hurt business.

It is both possible and imperative for gas companies to do business in Montana responsibly.

The Board of Oil and Gas will be meeting on June 15 at 10 a.m. in Sidney to hear the public’s response to their proposed rules, and we have until June 28 to present written feedback.

In the interests of public health and safe drinking water, please tell the Board of Oil and Gas that you want full disclosure and easy access to the list of chemicals they are pumping into our land.

Sally Owen-Still
Big Timber

 

Comments (0)
Categories : CBM, Clean Water, Letters, News

Letter: Fracking chemicals are cause for concern – Billings Gazette, June 8, 2011

By Larry Winslow · Comments (0)
Wednesday, June 8th, 2011

http://billingsgazette.com/news/opinion/mailbag/article_0e7bd932-5fb0-5f18-9855-63bbeb8a2fd9.html

I commend the Montana Board of Oil and Gas for initiating rulemaking for disclosure of fracking chemicals in oil and gas development. Many of these chemicals have the potential to contaminate groundwater and cause health problems in humans and livestock. A hearing on these proposed rules will be held in Sidney on June 15 at 10 a.m. at the fairgrounds.

As a rancher who has leased my minerals for gas exploration, I want to ensure that my water wells and springs are protected. I need to know what chemicals will be used prior to fracking a well so that I can test for them to determine my base line water quality. Should an accident occur, this is my insurance to prove damages if I have to go to court to seek restitution. My neighbors who also have water wells or springs within a mile of a proposed gas well should also have this information so they can test their base line.

The board’s proposed rules do not address this issue. That needs to change.

Paul Hawks
Melville

Comments (0)
Categories : CBM, Clean Water, Landowner Rights, Letters, News, Northern Plains Resource Council
Next Page »
  • News
  • Search
Recent Posts
  • Study coal shipments’ environmental effects, says Missoula councilor – Missoulian, May 15, 2012
  • Yellowstone County planning board seeks rail traffic study – Billings Gazette, May 14, 2012
  • Routine blast unleashes torrent in mine – Helena Independent Record, May 15, 2012
  • Kicking the coal habit – Audubon Magazine, May-June 2012
  • Free movie ‘Gasland’ May 17 at Yogo Inn in Lewistown

What People are Saying About Northern Plains:

"This thriving citizens organization exemplifies the ideal of public involvement in public processes… Northern Plains Resource Council gives a large group of Montanans an effective voice. We may not always agree with Northern Plains, but we commend the group for holding public decision-makers accountable."
—Billings Gazette editorial,
Nov. 16, 2001
"...it has been incredibly successful at bringing credible, if sometimes dissenting, viewpoints to public debates about ranching, mining and the general lifestyle enjoyed by this region. In the consideration of any number of issues, the group has been the key that opened public debate."
Billings Gazette editorial,
Nov. 27, 1991
"With a dogged, can-do attitude, this citizens group has helped to shape the future of Montana in the face of mounting pressure for the development of our natural resources."
—Sen. Max Baucus, quoted in Havre Daily News,
June 29, 1992
"What sets NPRC apart from many groups is their complete dedication to working with community people… The process of citizen involvement, at least in the context of small town Montana life, has been raised to an art form by this organization."
—Western Network, Citizen Involvement: Learning From Experience, 1994
“I am stunned by the courage you’ve had collectively, by your endurance over the past 37 years. You have always fought long odds.”
—Randy Udall, quoted in Billings Gazette,
Nov. 16, 2008
"Many have attacked members of the Northern Plains Resource Council for taking a stand on methane development. I think we ought to thank our lucky stars for their foresight, and their determination to protect the interests of farmers and ranchers in southeastern Montana."
—Roger Muggli, op-ed, Miles City Star,
Apr. 6, 2001
"But the birth, evolution, and sustained record of NPRC’s successes are, in some ways, unique to rural America, and, more broadly, unique to post-modern American environmentalism and should give all Montanans–or at least those vitally concerned about natural resources, land use, ranching, and family farming–some measure of optimism."
—Keith Edgerton, Montana State University / Billings, 2002,
Bridging Ideology in Rural America: The Northern Plains Resource Council, 1971-1975 
"Birthed out of an unusual coalition of ranchers and environmentalists, Northern Plains maintains this tradition of working with diverse groups, an anomaly in today’s era of conflict and divisiveness."
—Greg Gordon, Orion Afield Magazine,
Summer 2000
"They confound the common view that ordinary people are powerless in the face of industry."
—Billings Gazette editorial,
May 11, 2000
They’ve squared off against some of the world’s largest multinationals, this interesting amalgam of young environmental activists, farmers, ranchers and citizens concerned about mineral and other developments in the Northern Great Plains.
—John A. Alwin, 1982,
Eastern Montana: A Portrait of the Land and its People
"To say the agreement between Stillwater Mining Co. and Northern Plains Resource Council and its affiliates in Stillwater and Sweet Grass counties is remarkable understates its significance. The ‘Good Neighbor Agreement’ sets a standard beyond Montana’s borders for how citizens concerned with resource protection and a major mining company concerned with resource development can work together to resolve conflict.”
Billings Gazette editorial,
May 1, 2000
"Ten years after this legally binding agreement (the Good Neighbor Agreement) was signed, it remains a testament to the benefits of communication and cooperation."
—Billings Gazette editorial,
June 3, 2010

Follow changes on the Northern Plains website by subscribing to our RSS:

Subscribe to RSS
Find us on Facebook

  • Archives
  • Categories
Archives
Categories

Go paperless!

Join our e-mail list:
Home | Contact Us | Career Opportunities | Membership | Site Map | Photo Credits
Find us on Facebook | Subscribe to RSS | LOGIN | Copyright © 2012 All Rights Reserved
Northern Plains Resource Council
Site design by Element L Design