Layout Image
Join Northern Plains Resource Council Support Northern Plains Resource Council with a donation
  • News
  • About Us
    • How We Work
    • Events
    • What We Believe
    • History
      • 1970′s Coal
      • Family Agriculture
      • Tongue River Railroad
      • Hard Rock Mining
      • Property Rights
      • Coal Bed Methane
      • Going Green
      • The New Coal Rush
    • Our staff
    • Board of Directors
    • Contact us
    • Publications
    • Careers
  • The Issues
    • Agriculture
    • Clean Energy
    • Coal
    • Coal Bed Methane
    • Good Neighbor Agreement
    • Hydraulic fracturing and deep shale gas
    • Landowner Rights
    • Tar Sands Pipeline
    • Tongue River Railroad
  • Fact Sheets
    • See all fact sheets
    • Quick link >>
      • Your Water Your Rights
      • Old vs. New Energy
      • Clean Energy Jobs
      • Eminent Domain
      • Coal export factsheet
      • Coal Ash facts
      • Renewable Energy Standard
      • CBM: Doing it Right
      • Energy Efficiency in Schools
      • Farm to School Program
      • Hydraulic Fracturing
      • Hydro Projects Fact Sheet
      • No Mandatory Animal ID
      • Your Gas and Oil Land Rights
      • Otter Creek Coal Tract Facts
      • Tar Sands Pipeline
      • Pipeline Landowners Position
      • Pipeline Landowner Rights
      • Rural Electric Cooperation
      • Sustainable Biodiesel
  • Our Local Groups
    • Bear Creek Council
    • Bull Mountain Land Alliance
    • Carbon County Resource Council
    • Cottonwood Resource Council
    • Dawson Resource Council
    • Rosebud Protective Association
    • Stillwater Protective Association
    • Yellowstone Valley Citizens Council
  • Our Building
    • Overview
    • Home on the Range Gardens
    • Meeting room reservations
    • Meeting room request form
    • Photo gallery
    • Blessing of Building
  • Take Action
    • Support our work
    • Volunteer
    • Contact Public Officials
    • Write a letter
    • Making a Difference
  • Legislature
    • 2011 Legislative Scorecard.pdf
    • Legislative bills important to Northern Plains
    • For the Love of Montana Rally

Coal train traffic analyzed at local forums – Public News Service, April 17, 2012

· Comments (0)
Tuesday, April 17th, 2012

http://www.publicnewsservice.org/index.php?/content/article/25898-1

Deb Courson Smith
Public News Service – MT

MISSOULA – The amount of coal train traffic running through Montana is expected to at least double, as coal exports are stepped up. The trains will haul coal, mostly from Wyoming, to Washington and Oregon for shipment to Asia. There’s a meeting tonight in Missoula to talk about what the additional train traffic means for towns along the route.

Beth Kaeding, past chair of the Northern Plains Resource Council, says rail crossings will definitely be busier.

“This will mean longer response time for emergency responders, and there are a lot of health impacts from the Diesel fumes, as well as the coal dust.”

She says Diesel fumes and coal dust are linked to lung problems.

Kaeding says there is a small tax collected for the general fund from the shipments, but the economic and health costs haven’t been considered.

“So the impacts to the communities along the rail line aren’t being paid for. It ends up that the public, the taxpayer, bears the brunt of these trains.”

The stepped-up shipments can’t be made until the coal ports on the West Coast are expanded. Kaeding says their goal is to have the environmental and health impacts along the entire route considered in the decision to expand those ports.

Air quality and environmental impacts will be discussed at the forum, as well as the Asian demand for U.S. coal, which will mostly go to China. Northern Plains Resource Council is coordinating today’s meeting, and two more later this month in Helena and Bozeman on April 25 and 26.

Tonight’s meeting is at 7 p.m., Urey Hall, University of Montana. The April 25 meeting in Helena is at 6 p.m., Gateway Center. The April 26 meeting in Bozeman is at 7 p.m., Bozeman Public Library.

 

Comments (0)
Categories : Coal, Events, News, Northern Plains Resource Council

Bozeman Chronicle editorial: Train traffic could have ill effects for Bozeman – April 5, 2012

· Comments (0)
Monday, April 9th, 2012

http://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/opinions/article_5b044846-8031-11e1-8e9d-0019bb2963f4.html

Coal mined from one of the largest coal deposits in the world could more than triple the amount of train traffic that goes through Bozeman in the coming years.

Communities in eastern Montana and Wyoming would benefit from a coming coal boom that some see shaping up. Cities on the West Coast and Asian nations would benefit from the bounty of energy that coal would produce.

But what would Bozeman get?

Instead of the average of 15 trains that go through town now, some 40 additional 120- to 125-car trains could cross the city, affecting hundreds of homes, condos and businesses that sit on or near the tracks.

And that volume of trains could affect everyone in the city, with increases in diesel exhaust, coal dust and major disruptions of automobile traffic at street crossings. The traffic disruptions could force the construction of overpasses or underpasses at considerable expense to local taxpayers.

And it could be happening soon. Coal companies in the Powder River Basin, beneath which lies an immense deposit of coal, are planning to ship 110 million tons of coal to Asia by the year 2015.

State and local leaders need to get out in front of this issue now.

Opportunities for regulating the train traffic must be gauged. Possibilities for making the railroads and coal companies contribute to the cost of building new infrastructure to deal with the increased train traffic must be explored.

Any efforts on the part of the state to regulate this activity will likely run into federal interstate commerce laws that will favor the railroads. But where there’s a will, there’s a way.

Negotiations with the coal firms and railroads could produce agreements that will mitigate the effects. More strict laws governing noise and air pollution could also change the ways the railroads get the coal to potential markets.

But if we wait until the problem descends on us, it will be too late. The time to get informed is now.

The Northern Plains Resource Council is conducting an informational meeting on the potential effects of coal shipping at 7 p.m. April 26 in the Bozeman Public Library.

This is a meeting worth attending for everyone in Bozeman.

 

Comments (0)
Categories : Coal, Events, News, Newspaper editorial, Northern Plains Resource Council

Group says coal production may increase train traffic – Bozeman Daily Chronicle, April 3, 2012

· Comments (0)
Tuesday, April 3rd, 2012

http://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/news/economy/article_92d07790-7d3e-11e1-9647-001a4bcf887a.html

AMANDA RICKER
Chronicle Staff Writer

Today, an average of 15 trains pass through Bozeman every 24 hours.

In the future, another 40 trains may be added, said Beth Kaeding of the Northern Plains Resource Council, a conservation group based in Billings.

Increased sales of Wyoming and Montana coal from the Powder River Basin to Asian markets will result in more trains traveling from the basin to Northwest seaports, Kaeding said.

“So, what that means for Bozeman, and all the towns around the rail lines, is that coal train traffic is going to significantly increase,” she said.

Northern Plains has been holding conferences in cities across the state to discuss the issue.

However, Lynda Frost, spokeswoman for Montana Rail Link, which operates the railroad through Bozeman, said MRL isn’t expecting a significant increase in coal trains any time soon.

“Taking into consideration that there are a number of factors involved that could result in an increase in coal traffic, it could easily take as long as 10 years before a notable increase in coal traffic could be seen,” Frost wrote in an email to the Chronicle.

In Bozeman, rail lines run under Interstate 90 across North Rouse Avenue and past homes and businesses north of Front Street. The tracks pass the Village Downtown condominiums before heading out of town.

The railroad “is the northern boundary of our neighborhood,” said Chris Nixon, president of the Northeast Neighborhood Association, which represents about 1,300 homes and businesses.

Nixon said it seems like there has already been an increase in train traffic.

Kaeding said coal companies working in the Powder River Basin plan to ship 110 million tons of coal to Asia by 2015 if enough coal export facilities are built on the West Coast.

The Powder River Basin is one of the largest coal reserves in the world. And while coal use is declining in power plants in the United States, countries like China are using more and more of the fossil fuel, Kaeding said.

She said more trains rumbling through Bozeman would mean more pollution from diesel fumes and coal dust, increased traffic congestion, delays in emergency response and additional noise. Each coal train consists of 120 to 125 cars and stretches more than a mile long, Kaeding said.

Addressing some of Kaeding’s concerns, Frost said noise from more trains would be minimal because the trains travel at 60 mph. And Frost said coal dust has been reduced by 85 percent by using a modified loading chute and applying a surfactant to wet the surface of the coal.

Northern Plains will hold a public informational meeting on the issue at 7 p.m. April 26 in the large conference room at the Bozeman Public Library.

Panelists will include Kaeding; Clint McRae, a landowner near Colstrip who will talk about the impacts to the land and agriculture; Dr. Richard Damon, a retired doctor who will talk about health concerns; and Public Service Commissioner John Vincent, who will talk about alternative energy solutions.

Kaeding is also scheduled to present information to the Bozeman City Commission on April 16. And she will talk to members of the Northeast Neighborhood Association from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. April 18 at City Hall.

Amanda Ricker can be reached at aricker@dailychronicle.com or 582-2628.

 

Comments (0)
Categories : Coal, Events, Member news, News, Northern Plains Resource Council

A convergence of coal – Helena Independent Record, April 1, 2012

· Comments (1)
Monday, April 2nd, 2012

http://helenair.com/news/local/a-convergence-of-coal/article_d730757c-7bc0-11e1-9858-0019bb2963f4.html

Asian demand, future needs could add 20-30 120-car trains, coming and going through Helena, daily

By SANJAY TALWANI

The number of freight trains loaded with coal that pass through Helena could significantly grow in the next several years, thanks to the planned development of new ports on the West Coast with an eye on the abundant coal of eastern Montana and Wyoming.

The Northern Plains Resource Council estimates demand from Asian markets at the new ports could mean 20 to 30 additional fully loaded 120-car coal trains each day coming from Montana, and the same number of empty trains traveling the other direction.

That means more noise, diesel fumes and traffic delays, as well as increased response times for emergency vehicles, say critics of the traffic.

It’s unclear how such an increase would be distributed between the state’s two main rail routes from coal country, through Helena and Great Falls.

Now, Montana Rail Link averages five coal trains per day through Helena (half full, half empty) out of about 15 trains a day total, said a spokeswoman.

“It’s just going to be that much worse, when the number of trains increases,” said Eric Regensberger, who as representative of the Midtown-Sixth Ward Neighborhood Association fought in favor of a “quiet zone” for trains through town. “When you account for all the intersections and four whistles per intersection, it adds up.”

An engineering study on the quiet zone last year pegged the possible costs at $130,000 to $980,000 for the safety upgrades necessary if trains cut back on their use of loud horns.

“The general desire to have a quiet zone will just increase with increased train traffic,” he said.

The Sleeping Giant Citizens Council, an affiliate of the Northern Plains Resource Council, is holding a public forum on the issue April 25 at 6:30 p.m., at the Gateway Center, 1710 National Ave. (For more information, call NPRC at (406) 248-1154.)

The council’s apprehensions about the traffic come as developers in Washington and Oregon seek permits for ports that the NPRC says combined could eventually export as much as 150 million tons of coal annually. At the same time, demand from coal-fired powered plants in the American Midwest has been dropping, said Shiloh Hernandez of the Sleeping Giant Citizens Council.

Hernandez said more trains means more likelihood of accidents and derailments, danger to property valued near the tracks.

“It would be a significant disruption to the flow of life in the town,” he said.

He said there may have to be upgrades of lights and barriers and other infrastructure at crossings — maybe even new underpasses or overpasses, and he said government officials need to make sure the taxpayers are not stuck with the bill for such improvements.

Lynda Frost, a Montana Rail Link spokeswoman, said the rail company pays for its own infrastructure upgrades and that the rail line did not anticipate increases in coal traffic in the next year.

She said the coal dust releases from rail cars have been reduced by 85 percent by using a modified loading chute and applying certain substances on the coal.

Lewis and Clark County Commission Chairman Derek Brown and Helena City Commissioner Matt Elsaesser both said there have been no formal local government discussions about the potential increase. Elsaesser has also been working with Montana Rail Link on the development of the Centennial Trail through town.

County Sheriff Leo Dutton said there are multiple routes to most places in the valley, and emergency responders already consider the possibility of blocked railroad crossings when they travel. If there’s a delay, they can take Henderson Street or Interstate 15 into the north valley.

Trains are allowed to block traffic for a maximum of 15 minutes, he said.

Possibly problematic could be unexpected trains at the crossings at Head Lane and Birdseye Road, for example.

“Having the advantage to know that the road’s blocked would be critical,” he said. “But that doesn’t exist right now.”

 

Comments (1)
Categories : Coal, Events, Member news, News, Northern Plains Resource Council

General Motors decides climate change is real, pulls support from Heartland Institute – Huffington Post, March 30, 2012

· Comments (0)
Friday, March 30th, 2012

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/30/general-motors-heartland-institute-climate-change_n_1391217.html

By Sharon Silke Carty

After getting called out by an environmental group, General Motors has pulled support from the Heartland Institute, a Chicago-based nonprofit well-known for attacking the science behind global warming and climate change.

The automaker told the Heartland Institute last week that it won’t be making further donations, spokesman Greg Martin said. At a speech earlier this month, GM CEO Dan Akerson said his company is running its business under the assumption that climate change is real.

“We applaud GM’s decision and the message it sends — that it is no longer acceptable for corporations to promote the denial of climate change and that support for an organization like Heartland is not in line with GM’s values,” said Daniel Souweine, campaign director for Forecast the Facts, a group that urges meteorologists to talk more openly about climate change.

Internal documents leaked in February showed that the General Motors Foundation — which the automaker runs separately from its business — donated to the institute $15,000 in 2010 and again in 2011, with another $15,000 expected to be gifted this year.

Heartland, which identifies itself as a free-market think tank, has questioned the ideas on global warming through its newsletters, web site and associated scientists. Last year, the tagline for its annual conference on the subject was “Global Warming: Was It Ever Really a Crisis?”

Joseph Bast, president of The Heartland Institute, said GM had been a Heartland supporter for 20 years. “We regret the loss of their support, particularly since it was prompted by false claims contained in a fake memo circulated by disgraced climate scientist Peter Gleick,” he said in a statement. “We once again respectfully ask liberal advocacy groups such as Huffington Post, the Center for American Progress, 350.org and Greenpeace to stop attacking scientists who question the theory of man-made global warming and corporations and foundations that are willing to fund open debate on this important public policy issue.”

The Heartland Institute said the internal documents were stolen by someone posing as a member of the board, who asked for the material to be sent to a new email account. Since then, Peter Gleick, president and co-founder of climate research group the Pacific Institute, has confessed to the stunt and noted that he regrets his actions.

The bulk of Heartland’s funding comes from one anonymous donor, who has given the group $11 million since 2007.

Nonprofit groups are not legally obligated to reveal their donors. Previously Heartland was transparent about its funding, even posting a list of contributors on its website, but removed it in 2004.

“Critics who couldn’t or wouldn’t engage in fair debate over our ideas found the donor list a convenient place to find the names of unpopular companies or foundations, which they used in ad hominem attacks against us,” institute representatives wrote after taking down the list. “After much deliberation and with some regret, we now keep confidential the identities of all our donors.”

GM was not the only automaker to fund the Heartland Institute: Ford and Chrysler also contributed to it in the past. Ford and Chrysler told The Huffington Post that they had stopped funding the organization over the past decade, but neither automaker had records detailing reasons for pulling that support.

Greenpeace has pressured companies to stop funding Heartland, said Kert Davies, Greenpeace’s research director. “Their brand of intervention on the climate discussion, bending the information, is noxious,” he said. “GM doesn’t want to be associated with this kind of nonsense on climate change, which is great.”

Jamie Henn of 350.org said Heartland has been spreading misinformation to confuse people.

The Center for American Progress did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

 

Comments (0)
Categories : Clean Energy, Climate change, Fossil Fuels, News

Study: 20 jobs from Keystone XL – United Press International, March 20, 2012

· Comments (0)
Thursday, March 22nd, 2012

http://www.upi.com/Business_News/Energy-Resources/2012/03/20/Study-20-jobs-from-Keystone-XL/UPI-58381332244550/print#ixzz1prgBsXUX

ITHACA, N.Y — Around 20 permanent jobs are expected to be tied to the planned Keystone XL oil pipeline, a study from Cornell University found.

Canadian pipeline company TransCanada aims to build the Keystone XL oil pipeline to carry so-called tar sands oil from Alberta province to refineries along the southern U.S. coast.

The pipeline has become politicized, with Republican backers touting its employment and energy security benefits.

The White House denied a permit for TransCanada after lawmakers in Nebraska objected to the initial route planned through the Ogallala Aquifer.

A 24-page report from Cornell University, The Impact of Tar Sands Pipeline Spills on Employment and the Economy, concludes many claims about the project are inflated. The study states that a total of 20 permanent pipeline operation jobs are expected in the six states along the pipeline route.

“Meanwhile, the agricultural and tourism sectors are already a major employer in these states,” the report read. “Potential job losses to these sectors resulting from one or more spills from Keystone XL could be considerable.”

The report adds there is “strong evidence” that pipelines like Keystone XL will leak because of the corrosive nature of tar sands oil.

The largest and most expensive spill of tar sands oil occurred in southern Michigan in 2010. The Cornell University report estimated that spill cost around $725 million.

The report was published by Cornell’s Global Labor Institute, which says it works with trade unions to develop solutions to major social, economic and environmental challenges.

Comments (0)
Categories : Agriculture, News, Pipeline
« Previous Page
Next Page »
  • News
  • Search
Recent Posts
  • Study coal shipments’ environmental effects, says Missoula councilor – Missoulian, May 15, 2012
  • Yellowstone County planning board seeks rail traffic study – Billings Gazette, May 14, 2012
  • Routine blast unleashes torrent in mine – Helena Independent Record, May 15, 2012
  • Kicking the coal habit – Audubon Magazine, May-June 2012
  • Free movie ‘Gasland’ May 17 at Yogo Inn in Lewistown

What People are Saying About Northern Plains:

"This thriving citizens organization exemplifies the ideal of public involvement in public processes… Northern Plains Resource Council gives a large group of Montanans an effective voice. We may not always agree with Northern Plains, but we commend the group for holding public decision-makers accountable."
—Billings Gazette editorial,
Nov. 16, 2001
"...it has been incredibly successful at bringing credible, if sometimes dissenting, viewpoints to public debates about ranching, mining and the general lifestyle enjoyed by this region. In the consideration of any number of issues, the group has been the key that opened public debate."
Billings Gazette editorial,
Nov. 27, 1991
"With a dogged, can-do attitude, this citizens group has helped to shape the future of Montana in the face of mounting pressure for the development of our natural resources."
—Sen. Max Baucus, quoted in Havre Daily News,
June 29, 1992
"What sets NPRC apart from many groups is their complete dedication to working with community people… The process of citizen involvement, at least in the context of small town Montana life, has been raised to an art form by this organization."
—Western Network, Citizen Involvement: Learning From Experience, 1994
“I am stunned by the courage you’ve had collectively, by your endurance over the past 37 years. You have always fought long odds.”
—Randy Udall, quoted in Billings Gazette,
Nov. 16, 2008
"Many have attacked members of the Northern Plains Resource Council for taking a stand on methane development. I think we ought to thank our lucky stars for their foresight, and their determination to protect the interests of farmers and ranchers in southeastern Montana."
—Roger Muggli, op-ed, Miles City Star,
Apr. 6, 2001
"But the birth, evolution, and sustained record of NPRC’s successes are, in some ways, unique to rural America, and, more broadly, unique to post-modern American environmentalism and should give all Montanans–or at least those vitally concerned about natural resources, land use, ranching, and family farming–some measure of optimism."
—Keith Edgerton, Montana State University / Billings, 2002,
Bridging Ideology in Rural America: The Northern Plains Resource Council, 1971-1975 
"Birthed out of an unusual coalition of ranchers and environmentalists, Northern Plains maintains this tradition of working with diverse groups, an anomaly in today’s era of conflict and divisiveness."
—Greg Gordon, Orion Afield Magazine,
Summer 2000
"They confound the common view that ordinary people are powerless in the face of industry."
—Billings Gazette editorial,
May 11, 2000
They’ve squared off against some of the world’s largest multinationals, this interesting amalgam of young environmental activists, farmers, ranchers and citizens concerned about mineral and other developments in the Northern Great Plains.
—John A. Alwin, 1982,
Eastern Montana: A Portrait of the Land and its People
"To say the agreement between Stillwater Mining Co. and Northern Plains Resource Council and its affiliates in Stillwater and Sweet Grass counties is remarkable understates its significance. The ‘Good Neighbor Agreement’ sets a standard beyond Montana’s borders for how citizens concerned with resource protection and a major mining company concerned with resource development can work together to resolve conflict.”
Billings Gazette editorial,
May 1, 2000
"Ten years after this legally binding agreement (the Good Neighbor Agreement) was signed, it remains a testament to the benefits of communication and cooperation."
—Billings Gazette editorial,
June 3, 2010

Follow changes on the Northern Plains website by subscribing to our RSS:

Subscribe to RSS
Find us on Facebook

  • Archives
  • Categories
Archives
Categories

Go paperless!

Join our e-mail list:
Home | Contact Us | Career Opportunities | Membership | Site Map | Photo Credits
Find us on Facebook | Subscribe to RSS | LOGIN | Copyright © 2012 All Rights Reserved
Northern Plains Resource Council
Site design by Element L Design